Over a decade ago, when Berlin struggled to attract investment, then-mayor Klaus Wowereit famously called the German capital “poor, but sexy.” After a boom that drove up rents by more than 50% since 2011, the city may return to that era.
By freezing rents for five years, the local government is taking the most radical step yet to protect residents from the fallout of a housing crunch. While the move could provide short-term relief, the risk is a bigger hit down the road. Capping rents threatens to scare away investment, stalling everything from upgrading windows to constructing much-needed new apartments.
“This will do immense damage to Berlin’s image,” said Klaus-Peter Hesse, managing director of Germany’s ZIA real-estate lobby. “It’s bound to strain the city’s relationship with investors; anyone planning a housing development may well be having second thoughts now.”
Prodded by mass demonstrations and a grassroots initiative to force the government to buy out large landlords, Berlin is looking to suspend market forces in the housing sector. The legislation, due to go into effect next year, will freeze rents for five years and set caps for each neighborhood, so that people paying more can demand a reduction.
“Tenants will no longer be subject to constant rent increases and the pressure that comes with that,” said Katrin Lompscher, Berlin’s senator for housing, as she presented the plan on Tuesday. “Shelter is a basic need.”
The measures would be backdated to the day of the announcement to prevent landlords from jacking up rents preemptively, and property owners that break the rules could face a fine of up to 500,000 euros ($564,000), underscoring the city’s determination to provide relief for renters, which make up the majority of Berlin’s population.
Still, real-estate experts and big landlords argue that relaxing construction regulations and accelerating approvals would do more to ease the crunch. Building an apartment block in Berlin can take as long as 15 years from conception to completion, around twice as long as in the U.K., according to ZIA’s Hesse.
Some have accused Berlin’s government of contributing to the housing crunch by prioritizing vanity projects. Here’s a few high-profile cases:
While Berlin’s rent freeze is an extreme reaction, the lack of affordable housing has become a global issue. Governments from Amsterdam to Vancouver are struggling to find ways of preventing tenants from being priced out of their own neighborhoods. The public backlash in cities including New York and Hong Kong has prompted political action.
Spain has tried to control rents, but to limited effect. In May, two months after the government imposed a battery of measures to keep costs down, rent increases actually accelerated to 7.5%.
Similarly, Berlin’s move risks exacerbating the problem by discouraging investment. That raises the prospect of at least a partial return to the days when Berlin was a real-estate backwater, marked by rows of dilapidated buildings.
“This will definitely have a big impact on everyone in the construction industry, from big developers to craftsmen such as parquet-floor makers,” said Manja Schreiner, managing director of the Building Trades Association. “It’s a big worry, particularly for the smaller companies.”
Vonovia SE tried to bolster its image by highlighting its role in providing affordable housing with a
“reformulated” business philosophy.
For now, they have little choice but to keep their heads down and hope for the best.
While Berlin’s move is sure to be challenged in court, “a legal contest of such law can be lengthy and may only start after it’s in place,” Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Iwona Hovenko and Sue Munden said in a